Internet Journal of Airway Management

 

Homepage

Volume 4 (January 2006 to December 2007)

 

Lackner-Ausserhofer H, Krasser K, Missaghi SM, Moser A, Zadrobilek E. Video Laryngoscopy-Assisted and Gastric Tube-Guided Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway


References

 

  1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Stube PJ. The LMA ProSeal - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 84:650-654, 2000.

  2. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bugie-guided insertion of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 100:25-29, 2004.

  3. Brimacombe JR. ProSeal LMA for ventilation and airway protection. In: Brimacombe JR (ed) Laryngeal mask anesthesia. Principles and practice. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 505-537, 2005. 

  4. Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan R. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg 14:1171-1175, 2004.

  5. Cook TM, Cranshaw J. Randomized crossover comparison of ProSealR Laryngeal Mask airway with Laryngeal Tube SondaR during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 95:261-266, 2005.

  6. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 52:739-760, 2005.

  7. Garcia-Aguado R, Vinoles J, Brimacombe J, Vivo M, Lopez-Estudillo R, Ayala G. Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Can J Anesth 53:398-403, 2006.

  8. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kihara S. Gum elastic bugie-guided placement of the ProSeal LMA (correspondence). Can J Anesth 49:528-529, 2002.

  9. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 30:624-627, 2002.

  10. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patient. Br J Anaesth 85:262-266, 2000.

  11. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Puhringer F. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices. Interobserver variability and comparison between the standard, flexible, and intubating laryngeal mask airways (in German). Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 35:693-694, 2000.

  12. Kihara S, Brimacombe JR, Yaguchi Y, Taguchi N. A comparison of sex- and weight-based ProSealTM laryngeal mask size selection criteria. A randomized study of healthy anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Anesthesiology 101:340-343, 2004.

  13. Krasser K, Moser A, Missaghi SM, Lackner-Ausserhofer H, Zadrobilek E. Experiences with the Lo Pro Adult GlideScope Video Laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation.  Internet Journal of Airway Management 4, 2006-2007. Date accessed: December 31, 2007.

  14. Micaglio M, Parotto M, Trevisanuto D, Zanardo V, Ori C. GlidescopeTM/gastric-tube guided technique: a back-up approach for ProSealTM LMA insertion (correspondence). Can J Anesth 53:1063-1064, 2006.

  15. Silsby J, Jordan G, Bayley G, Cook TM. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as simulators for inserting the LMA ClassicTM. Anaesthesia 61:576-579, 2006.

  16. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 61:211-216, 1988.

 

Implications for Clinical Practice

Webmaster: Ernst Zadrobilek, MD.
URL: http://www.ijam.at/
Email address: ernst.zadrobilek@adair.at